![](https://assets.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images/podcasts/images/f/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cover_medium.jpg?v=0)
October 1st, 2023 • 35 mins 7 secs • Download (32.2 MB) • Link with Timestamp
Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige